As the saying goes, “dress for the job you want, not the job you have.” Clothing, predictably, impacts what other people think of a person. However, new research shows that it’s not just them, clothing also affects how you view yourself.
Now the real question is, what do we do with this information? Many articles discuss ways of turning clothing into a tool for success on the job. However, I recently stumbled upon an article from the Huffington Post that discusses some of the stranger points. I have listed some of my favorites below:
A masculine style on a woman makes her a more likely candidate for hire when compared a candidate wearing a feminine style.
Men in tailored suits are perceived to be more confident.
Unfashionable and outdated clothing causes people to stand further away.
People have a higher likelihood of giving money to someone dressed like them.
The remainder of the list is also very interesting, although I don’t think I needed a study to know that women are more likely than men to own more than 10 pairs of shoes.
It makes me wonder if the clothing choice creates a different response from others or causes the wearer’s behavior to change, making people respond to them differently. It’s probably the result of both.
I think a lot can be drawn from point number four in particular. Perhaps, a similar style can create a sense of connection between individuals. It’s worth considering the environment and people you will be dealing with before choosing an outfit for the day. That choice may impact how people respond to you and help you relate to them.
Try dressing like a person you’d like to befriend or dress to blend in a certain setting. Do you feel different, do people respond to you differently, or both?
As the saying goes, History repeats itself; interestingly, so does fashion.
The fashion cycle
The typical fashion cycle goes through five stages according to fashiondesignscope.com. First, designers introduce a style, that style is often worn by chosen “fashion leaders,” such as high profile celebrities. When a celebrity wears a new style it gets attention from fans and the media. The hype translates into mass production of the style. The public’s interest develops the style into a popular trend, as more people adapt the look. Eventually, the excitement dies down as the market becomes saturated and people become bored. Form there a style is replaced by something new and more exciting, typically introduced by the same famous people and designers.
The famous have led the fashion industry for years. “Before the civil war, Paris was the fashion center,” said Robin Kloosterman, a historical reenactment and fashion enthusiast. She proposed that, before movie stars introduced the trends, it was royalty and the nobility. This is a concept called trickle down theory, originally created by Thorstein Veblen in 1899. Trickle down theory states that lower classes will try and mimic the wealthy and influential by adapting their styles. These styles are originally introduced at higher prices than the masses can afford and with time become available to the general public
Kloosterman recalls the time when women would get their fashion magazines every month or two and adapt the styles for themselves on their sewing machines. In a way, this was faster than today’s method. The internet makes new styles instantly known, but most of us must wait for manufacturers to start producing the things we want to buy. If they ever do. And don’t worry, if you miss a style you like it will probably reappear in stores a few years down the road.
Old Trend, New Spin
If you don’t think fashion trends repeat just ask any relative or friend over 30, if you’re over 30, think back to your teen years and you might notice some fashion similarities. The repeat is not always glaringly obvious, old ideas are often reshaped or iconic articles of clothing are combined with other trends. For example, the famous bell bottoms reappeared more subtly as flare pants, while we see a resurgence of leggings and neon hues from the 80’s (minus the leg warmers). Some items come back into style as retro or vintage trends. According to www.insideoutstylblog.com, a fashion fad will only last 3 to 12 months, a trend will last 1 to 5 years and a classic will be around for 5 to 10 years. Then if you wait around 20 years the trend will hit the scene again.
In the next few years this pattern may begin to change. Consumers have a little more style freedom with the increase in online shopping, since online stores are not limited by the trends available at the local mall. Popular looks are quickly picked up by social media and shared with the world, and consumers are quick to adopt the new look. Unfortunately, with online shopping it’s hard to choose something that is certain to fit. According to Peder Stubert’s Huffington Post article, technology could solve this deterrent. Some online retailers are introducing functions that alert the buyer to size differences between past purchases. Other companies are creating “virtual fitting,” technology that can either cross reference current garments with an online product or use 3D computer body modeling. Technology could make online shopping easier and more convenient.
With so many different styles, the challenge is what to do with all of it. There is a whole world of fashion at our fingertips, both in style and out of style. There are more tools to create your own distinct look than ever before. Old styles can easily be recreated or reimagined by consumers. As Kloosterman said, “It’s more than knowing what the clothes are it’s how they wore them.” That information can be used to bring back an old look or modernize a out of style article of clothing. The tools are out there, what are you going to do with them?